GSO News Volume 2 Number 3, April 2006
Katherine A. Hagen - Managing Director

GSO News is a subscription service provided by the Geneva Social Observatory.  We report on developments at WHO, WTO, ILO and many other Geneva-based organizations, as well as other selected developments on global social issues. We hope you enjoy our news service, and we invite your comments and suggestions (please send them to gsonews@gsogeneva.ch).  We welcome subscriptions and are now offering a wider choice of subscription payment options.  Connect to our subscription page at http://www.gsogeneva.ch/subscribe.asp.  We encourage you to share the information on how to subscribe with others.  Thank you for your support.  The detailed news follows the table of contents below.  

GSO News Digest April 2006

1.     Human Rights Council Elections

2.     HIV/AIDS at the ILO, the ICFTU, Lesotho and CNN!

3.     Global Fund Board meeting

4.     Global Compact Board and Foundation

5.     WIPO on Patents, Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

6.     WTO Negotiations Update

7.     WHO Publications of Note

8.     The GSO GAINs a New Neighbour

9.     Internet Governance Forum Consultations

10.   Personnel Changes

11.   Forthcoming Events

Back to the top

GSO News April 2006 

1.     Human Rights Council Elections

The first elections of the new Human Rights Council will be held by the General Assembly on 9 May.  An inaugural meeting will take place on 19 June in Geneva.  The members elected will be elected directly and individually by a majority of the General Assembly members.  They will not be eligible for immediate re-election after two consecutive terms.  There are 47 seats divided between five regions of the world.  Thirteen will be African, thirteen will be Asian, six will be Eastern European, eight will be Latin American and Caribbean, and seven will be Western.  There are more announced candidates than slots for every region except Africa, which has only thirteen candidates for its thirteen seats.  However, even these will individually have to garner a majority of General Assembly votes to be elected.

The countries running for election to the Council from Western States are Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.  From Eastern European states, Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, the Czech Republic, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, the Russian Federation, Slovenia, and the Ukraine are running for election.  From Latin America, Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela are running for election.  Asian countries running for election are Bangladesh, Bahrain, China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Japan, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, and Thailand.  The African states running for election are Algeria, Djibouti, Gabon, Kenya, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Nigeria, Senegal, Tunisia, and Zambia. 

Each country is being asked to present voluntary electoral commitments and pledges. Although the General Assembly has given no specific guidance on the content of such pledges the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has provided some suggestions. (See http://www.ohchr.org/english/13042006.pdf).  Amnesty International is supplementing this with a website that provides a human rights profile on each candidate country.  (See http://www.amnesty.org.)

The US has been clear that it will not run for election in this round, although they will support the new Council in other ways.  .

Back to the top

2.     HIV/AIDS at the ILO, the ICFTU, in Lesotho (with Prince Harry) and on CNN (with former President Bill Clinton)  

April is proving to be a lively month for actions to combat HIV and AIDS.  At the ILO, 28 April was World Day for Safety and Health at Work.  A new report on “Decent Work – Safe Work – HIV/AIDS” was issued on the occasion, emphasizing the importance of workplace-related actions for prevention, mitigation, care and support, and the elimination of stigma and discrimination.  Over 40 million people are currently HIV positive, and over half of these are men and women in the economically active age group of 15 to 49.  This is indeed a working-age pandemic.  The ILO report identifies the significant psycho-social issues that need to be addressed in the workplace and highlights the importance of good management practices, as described in the ILO Guidelines on Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems.   (See http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/safework/worldday/index.htm.)

On a parallel track, the ICFTU spearheaded the Eleventh International Commemoration Day for Dead and Injured Workers, also on April 28.  In tandem with the ILO, the ICFTU featured the theme of HIV/AIDS in the workplace, calling for renewed action at the next G8 Summit in Moscow for the eight world leaders to honor their commitment to development aid and participation in the fight against HIV and AIDS.  (See http://www.icftu.org/displaydocument.asp?Index=991223759&Language=EN.) 

Other interesting AIDS developments include the announcement on 27 April of a new charity by Prince Harry of the United Kingdom, focusing on children living with AIDS in Lesotho.  The charity is called “Sentebale” which means “Forget me not” in Sesotho, the most widely spoken language of Lesotho.   It is in memory of Prince Harry’s mother Diana, the Princess of Wales.  And on 29 and 30 April, the “End of AIDS:  A Global Summit with former President Bill Clinton” is being aired on CNN.   Experiences in Lesotho, which has received heightened donor attention in the past couple of years, show how difficult it is to combat the pandemic.  A recent report cites that only 10,000 people in Lesotho (out of an estimated 360,000 of the population living with HIV or AIDS) are receiving anti-retroviral treatment because of the inadequate health infrastructure, limited number of health professionals and continued fear of stigma and discrimination.  (See http://www.msf.org/msfinternational/invoke.cfm?objectid=72DBA7BF-F0AC-E663-6778A6D893FDDCD9&component=toolkit.article&method=full_html.) 

Back to the top

3.     Global Fund Board meeting

The Board of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has met from 27 to 28 April.  Most importantly, the Board decided that a new round of grant proposals from countries fighting AIDS, TB and Malaria, the Sixth Round, would be held in order to be able to approve a new round of grants at the next meeting in November 2006.  

This new round of grant proposals is significant because many countries will be nearing the end of their grants’ five-year period.  This will allow countries to continue the programs in which they are already involved in solving the problems associated with HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis or malaria. 

Grant proposals will be submitted by countries to the Global Fund.  They will then be evaluated by an Independent Technical Review Panel.  The proposals that are cleared by the Panel based on quality standards are then recommended to the Board of the Global Fund for approval.  The programs the Board approves are typically two years in length, with the option to renew for another three years if results are underway.  The deadline for submitting grants for Round Six will be 3 August, and approvals will be made from 1-3 November.  The Board has also asked for donors to pledge enough funds to ensure the success of Round 6 by the time of the meeting in November. 

In his annual report to the Board Executive Director Professor Richard Feacham gave an outline and an update on the progress of the five corporate priorities that he and the Secretariat have focused on in the last year. (See http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/files/boardmeeting13/GF-B13-3_Report_by_the_Executive_Director.pdf). The first goal has been to develop the Global Fund’s Strategy by completing a final draft of a comprehensive four-year plan identifying the size and strategic positioning of the Global Fund, and most importantly, how to ensure financial support for programs whose funding has run out. 

The second goal of the Secretariat has been to ‘scale up interventions and align and harmonize policies.’ He remarked that, although the increasing impact of the Global Fund is becoming well known, it is still important to work toward increasing investments. The third goal that the Executive Director discussed is “managing for results and measuring impact of investments”.

Securing resources to meet needs in 2006 and 2007 is the fourth goal and enhancing internal systems to ensure a high-performing, well-managed and efficient Secretariat is the fifth.

In a post script to his report he acknowledged his thanks to friends and colleagues and referred to the work yet to be done with the hopes of “handing over an effective, dynamic, ambitious, impatient, self-critical and restless Global Fund to my successor”.

Back to the top

4.     Global Compact Board and Foundation  

Following an extensive review during 2004-2005 the UN Secretary-General announced the appointment of 20 members to the Board of the UN Global Compact on 20 April. The new members, listed below, represent business worldwide (10 members), business associations and labour groups (four), civil society organizations (four) with two ex-officio members from the Global Compact Office and from the newly launched Foundation for the Global Compact. Each of the members has an established association with the Global Compact.

The first annual meeting of the Board is due to take place this summer at the UN Headquarters in New York with the main objective of promoting and facilitating the work of the Global Compact.

The new Foundation’s role is to raise funds for Global Compact operations from the private sector. It has three Directors - chaired by Sir Mark Moody-Stuart of Anglo-American plc, who is accompanied by James Kearney, Senior Partner of Latham & Watkins LLP and Professor Oliver Williams, Director of the Business and Ethics Centre at Mendoza College, University of Notre Dame. See www.unglobalcompact.org for more information. 

Global Compact Board:

Business

Mr. Talal ABU GHAZALEH; Chairman and CEO, Talal Ghazaleh Organization, Egypt

Professor José Sergio Gabrielli de AZEVEDO; President and CEO, Petrobras, Brazil

Mr. Guillermo CAREY; Senior Partner, Carey & Allende Abogados, Chile

Mrs. CHEN Ying; Deputy Director General, China Enterprise Confederation, China

Mrs. Suzanne Nora JOHNSON; Vice Chairman, Goldman Sachs Group, USA

Ms. Anne LAUVERGEON; Chair of the Executive Board, Areva, France

Ms. Ntombifuthi MTOBA; Chair of the Board, Deloitte, South Africa

Mr. B. MUTHURAMAN; Managing Director, Tata Steel, India

Professor Mads OEVLISEN; Adjunct Professor and Chair, Lego, Denmark

Mr. Hiroyuki UEMURA; President, Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co., Japan  

International Labour and Business Organizations

Mr. Fred HIGGS; General Secretary, International Federation of Chemical, Energy, Mine and General Workers’ Unions

Mr. Antonio PENALOSA; Secretary-General, International Organization of Employers

Mr. Guy RYDER; General Secretary, International Confederation of Free Trade Union

Mr. Guy SEBBAN; Secretary-General, International Chamber of Commerce

Civil Society

Mrs. Habiba AL MARASHI; Chair, Emirates Environmental Group

Mr. Oded GRAJEW; Chair of the Board, Instituto Ethos de Empresas e Responsabilidade Social

Dr. Huguette LABELLE; Chair, Transparency International

Mrs. Mary ROBINSON; Chair, Realizing Rights - The Ethical Globalization Initiative

Ex-Officio

Sir Mark MOODY-STUART; Chairman, Foundation for the Global Compact

Mr. George KELL; Executive Head, UN Global Compact Office

Back to the top

5.     WIPO on Patents, Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore  

The World Intellectual Property Organization hosted a number of events in April that show the continuing North/South divide on the global harmonization of substantive patent law, the “Development Agenda” for intellectual property rights, and the relationship of these rights to genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore.  As we reported in March (GSO News, Vol. II, No. 2), WIPO held an Open Forum on the Substantive Patent Law Treaty on 1 to 3 March, to serve as a channel for proposals relating to the possibilities for harmonization of patent law.  Forum presenters and participants had some heated discussion about the interaction between intellectual property rights and public health policy.  On 10 to 12 April, an informal session of the Standing Committee on the Law of Patents (SPC) met to prepare a work plan for harmonization.  The informal session ended in an impasse, and further efforts to proceed with patent law harmonization had to be postponed until the WIPO Assemblies in September.  This means that the previously scheduled dates for starting on the plan of work on 3 to 7 July have been cancelled. 

The US and Japan proposed a work plan that would be limited to harmonizing four aspects of the criteria each country uses for determining “patentability.”  The four aspects pertain to how one defines “prior art”, “novelty”, “grace period” and “inventive step”.  Supporters of this approach argue that national laws can and should be harmonized with common definitions of these terms.  On the other hand, the Friends of Development group, led by Brazil, Argentina and India, proposed the inclusion of nine additional issues, emanating from the March forum, relating to such issues as the impact of patents on development or protecting the genetic resources of developing countries.  The two sides could not agree.

One tentative compromise would have connected the debate on patent harmonization with the developing countries’ interest in a binding instrument to protect genetic resources and traditional knowledge.  A separate Inter-Governmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC) met at WIPO from 24 to 28 April, to consider ways to integrate these concerns into WIPO policy.  As previously reported, the same concerns are being addressed at the TRIPS Council at the World Trade Organization and the Conference of the Parties for the Convention on Biodiversity.  (See the March 2006 issue of GSO News.)  The main issues are establishing global requirements for disclosure of the use of any genetic resources, traditional knowledge or folklore in the substantive claims underlying a patent request and for ensuring prior informed consent and benefit-sharing with the government of the country from which these items are being taken for a patent application.  Critics of establishing such global requirements argue that existing contract law is sufficient to ensure disclosure, prior informed consent and benefit-sharing. 

In spite of differences about global or national action, the IGC has developed two “mature drafts of revisions outlining objectives and principles for the protection of traditional knowledge and folklore”.  (See http://www.wipo.int/edocs/prdocs/en/2006/wipo_pr_2006_446.html.)  Thus the IGC is edging towards a body of possible policy and legal measures that could be and are already being used at either national or global levels (or even regional levels, for that matter).  But the debate on how to handle genetic resources as promulgated in the Convention for Biodiversity continues to lack a consensus.  Meanwhile, the IGC has approved an advisory board for a new Voluntary Fund for Indigenous and Local Communities.  The Voluntary Fund was set up with contributions from the French Government and Swedish International Biodiversity Programme to make it possible for people from indigenous and local communities to participate in IGC meetings.  The IGC itself will reach the end of its current mandate in 2007.

Back to the top 

6.     WTO negotiations update  

After a series of attempted negotiations on agriculture and manufacturing (“NAMA” or non-agricultural manufacturing access) in March and the first few weeks of April, WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy participated in informal consultations with key negotiators (the “Green Room” equivalent of an executive committee) on Friday, 21 April and then with the heads of delegations of all WTO member States with a presence in Geneva on Monday, 24 April.  Lamy then announced what everyone had already concluded, that the April 30 deadline for “modalities” in agriculture and NAMA could not be met.  Thus, the mini-ministerial that was never really scheduled on the occasion of the April 30 deadline was “cancelled”, in spite of the official dissatisfaction of the US over this cancellation and whose outgoing and incoming trade ministers announced their intentions to come to Geneva anyway.  The developments are widely covered in the media, from the three-way brinksmanship among the US, the EU and the G-20 major developing countries led by Brazil and India, to the African summit of trade ministers, to the frustrations of the NGOs about the politics of the “Green Room.”  Detailed coverage of the negotiations can also be found at www.ictsd.org

Here we limit our comments to some of the political dynamics that we see from our multistakeholder GSO perspective.  A special call for a meeting of the Trade Negotiations Committee was issued for Monday, 1 May.  Outgoing US Trade Representative Robert Portman and US Trade Representative-designate Susan Schwab announced plans to be in Geneva on Wednesday and Thursday, 3 and 4 May.  The Japanese Agriculture Minister Shoichi Nakagawa, the Australian trade minister Mark Vaile and the Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim also announced their plans to be in town.  EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson announced a speech in Zurich on Friday, 5 May, and it is also reported that Indian Commerce Minister Kamal Nath is “travelling in Europe.”  Director-General Lamy and the ambassadorial chairs of the agriculture and NAMA negotiations have announced that they will continue, over the next six weeks, without any deadlines, in continuous text-based, Geneva-based negotiations.  There will supposedly be no more mini-ministerial summits outside Geneva.  However, it sounds as though a mini-ministerial in Geneva is potentially in the making.

As stated by Lamy on Tuesday, 25 April, the key to moving forward rests with the EU.  He believes that the EU can “top up” its existing offer on cutting agricultural tariffs.  An improvement in the EU’s offer has been the main condition from the G-20 before they are prepared to improve their offer on NAMA.  The EU has looked to the G20 to make the first move, and last week Mandelson even suggested that it was the US that had to break the logjam on domestic agricultural subsidies. 

The anxieties of the NGOs were expressed in a letter to Director-General Lamy on 19 April, complaining about the “Green Room” process and limiting negotiations to a few major players rather than the whole membership of the WTO.  The term “Green Room” refers to the colour of the Director-General’s conference room in years gone by, a room that only accommodates 20 or so people and a room that has typically been used to work out the details of negotiations among “interested” parties, as selected by the Director-General and/or the chairs of the negotiating committees involved.  Lamy defends the need for the Green Room process, since it is basically impossible to involve all 149 members in all aspects of the negotiations.  The WTO does not have a representative governing body or executive committee, and this ad hoc process is a necessary but discomforting alternative. 

Some of the NGOs, of course, want to slow down the process completely, not just broaden the participatory framework.  What is not clear is whether the small and less developed countries that the NGOs are speaking up for are as concerned as the NGOs are about the process.  On the other hand, it is Lamy’s view that technical support is being made available to calculate impact on individual countries and that timely consultations will continue to be carried out with all member States to allow for their own evaluation of the modalities, schedules and related provisions.  One hears quite a bit about the importance both of capacity-building (Aid for Trade) and taking care of the preferences and other special accommodations (special safeguard mechanisms for sudden imbalances and provisions for special products, etc) for the smaller developing countries who aren’t directly in the negotiating room. 

Back to the top

7.     WHO Publications of Note

April was a busy month for the issuance of WHO publications of note – the report of the WHO Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health, the annual World Health Report on “Working Together for Health,” and new international “Child Growth Standards”. 

The CIPIH Report came out first, on 3 April, with considerable fanfare, as the first report for WHO of this nature ever commissioned by the Member States.  Delayed by more than four months because of disagreements among the Commission members, the report contains over 50 recommendations but also some statements of reservations from five of the ten Commissioners, although the Chair of the Commission Ruth Dreifuss affirms in the Preface to the report that all ten members of the Commission agreed with its recommendations.  One can identify certain ongoing and emerging issues that are likely to stimulate serious policy deliberations at the WHO (and elsewhere), with some of these issues continuing to be quite controversial.  As the WHO Director-General stated in January, this is “the first report for WHO of this nature ever commissioned by Member States.”   As noted by Chairperson Ruth Dreifuss, there is a heightened international consciousness about the negative correlation between health and poverty, along with the possibility for additional financing for development enhanced by new scientific advances and new institutional forms of health care.  The recommendations include support for a new global plan of action to encourage the development of health care products for neglected diseases, revisions to the compulsory licensing provisions, new mechanisms for public/private partnerships, government involvement in the pricing of health care products in low and lower middle income countries, but they do not challenge the basic value of intellectual property rights and innovation.  The recommendations will be tied to a draft resolution to be acted upon by a “mini-Executive Board meeting” on 28 April and by the World Health Assembly in May. 

The annual World Health Day was celebrated on 7 April at the World Health Organization and around the world.  The slogan of this year's World Health Day was “Working Together for Health,” with the focus on the crisis in the health workforce around the world.  Problems such as clinics without health workers and hospitals that cannot keep staff plague all countries in the world.  According to Dr. Tim Evans, Assistant Director-General of Evidence and Information Policy at the WTO, “There is a chronic global shortage of health workers, as a result of decades of under investment in their education, training, salaries, working environment and management. This has led to a severe lack of key skills, rising levels of career switching and early retirement, as well as national and international migration.”

On 7 April, attention was given to this crisis, with the main site of celebration in Lusaka, Zambia, where the Director-General released the World Health Report 2006.  Another celebration took place in London.  The two sites were video-linked, showing the “developing and developed world working together for health.”  Celebrations also took place in Geneva, and around the world.

On 27 April, the WHO announced new international “Child Growth Standards” for infants and young children up to age five.  These standards were developed through an extensive research project in Norway, India, Brazil, Ghana, Oman and the USA.  The standards are intended to replace standards that were previously based only on studies of child growth in the USA. The main message in the promulgation of these new standards is that all children have the potential to develop within the same range of height and weight, regardless of where they are born.  Nutrition, feeding practices, environment and healthcare are more important determinants than either genetics or ethnicity.  The standards are “growth velocity” standards that include new indicators of weight for age, length and height for age, weight for height and length, and a body mass index.  The WHO also asserts that the indicators emphasize the importance of breastfeeding as the norm for infants up to the age of six months.  It is predicted that these new standards will show substantially higher “wasting rates” for infants and a greater prevalence of overweight children, with some variations by age, sex and nutritional status.  (See www.who.int.) 

Back to the top

8.     The GSO GAINs a New Neighbour

GSO is pleased to note – and welcome - a new neighbour.  As of 1 May the Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN) moves into the same building where the GSO is located, at 37/39 Rue de Vermont in Geneva.  GAIN is a Swiss foundation established in 2003 to bring together UN agencies, the World Bank, business and civil society in support of improved nutrition in developing countries.  It currently has 15 major projects in 14 countries and has recently received additional funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for ten new projects benefiting another 200 million people in Bangladesh, Egypt, India and Indonesia.  Companies like Tetra Pak, Heinz and Seaboard Corp are supporting this effort, too.  A specific private sector link has also been established, the Business Alliance for Food Fortification, co-chaired by GAIN supporters Coca-Cola, Danone and Unilever.  It is a bit “baffling” that there should be both private sector participation in GAIN and a separate private sector arm, although it would seem that the one is oriented to grant-driven projects and the other is oriented to stimulating business ventures.  So a “BAFFling” role in GAIN is in fact a broadening of the effort to encompass both business ventures and development projects.    

Back to the top

9.     Internet Governance Forum Consultations

The second round of multistakeholder consultations in preparation for the forthcoming Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in Athens from 30 October to 2 November 2006 will take place in Geneva on 19 May.  The agenda will follow up the discussions from 16 to 17 February with a focus on the substantive preparation of IGF including setting the agenda to include a variety of public policy issues and organizing priorities. 

Additionally, 17 May is World Information Society Day (WISD).  There will be a ‘cluster’ of events the week before, beginning 9 May, and the week after the WISD, culminating with the second round of IGF consultations and the first meeting of the IGF Advisory Group. 

In the meantime nominations have been submitted for candidates to the IGF Advisory Group.  Following suggestions at the initial IGF consultations in February, the IGF Advisory Group will be a single, multistakeholder advisory group to assist the IGF secretariat in their task of forming the IGF event in October.

The IGF Advisory Group will have around forty members, representing governments, private sector and civil society as well as members of the academic and technical communities. The first meeting of the Advisory Group will take place from 22 to 23 May 2006 and will be open to relevant intergovernmental organizations.  

Back to the top

10.     Personnel Changes

The election of Dr Lieve Fransen as Vice Chair of the Board of the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria was announced on 13 April after Prof. Michel Kazatchkine, France's Ambassador on HIV/AIDS and Transmissible Diseases announced his resignation in January. Dr. Lieve Fransen is Head of the Human and Social Development Unit at the Directorate-General for Development of the European Commission.  More information about Dr. Fransen can be found at http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/media_center/press/an_060413.asp.

We can confirm that the US seat on the Board has been filled by Dr. Bill Steiger, Special Assistant to the Director of International Relations at the US Department of Health and Human Services, following the promotion of Randall Tobias from the US HIV/AIDS Coordinator to Deputy Secretary of State for Development, a new post, in conjunction with his becoming the new Administrator for the US Agency for International Development. 

As mentioned in the March issue of GSO News US Ambassador to the UN in Geneva Kevin Moley will be leaving his post on 1 May and is due to be replaced by Warren Tichenor.  Tichenor is a wealthy media entrepreneur from San Antonio, Texas with extensive holdings in Hispanic broadcasting.  He is expected to arrive in Geneva in June.

Meanwhile, at the ILO, Executive Director Sally Paxton has announced her departure in June.  No announcement has been made about her successor, but the US tripartite constituents of the ILO, the US Council for International Business, the AFL-CIO and the US Labor Department, are expected to engage in a search for nominees. 

At the WIPO, Deputy Director-General for Copyright and Related Rights Rita Hayes will also be leaving.  The US Government has already nominated Michael Keplinger to take her place.  Keplinger is Senior Counsel in the Office of International Relations of the US Patent and Trademark Office.  The Director-General and the WIPO Coordination Committee will finalize senior management appointments at a meeting in June. 

Back to the top

11.     Forthcoming Events

A listing of events in May and June 2006 taking place in Geneva unless otherwise indicated.

29 April – 3 May        WIPO International Seminar on the Strategic Use of Intellectual Property for Economic and Social Development (Muscat, Oman)

1 May                          WTO Trade Negotiation Committee

1-5 May                      14th Session of the WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights

1-19 May                    36th Session of the United Nations Committee Against Torture

1-19 May                    36th Session of the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

1 May - 9 June           United Nations International Law Commission

3-4 May                      WTO informal high-level bilaterals and possible “Green Room” discussions

3-5 May                      13th Session of the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty Union - Meeting of International Authorities under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

8-12 May                    UNCTAD 23rd Special Session of the Trade and Development Board

9 May                          Elections to the Human Rights Council (New York)

15 May                       WTO General Council

15-19 May                  ECOSOC 9th Session of the Commission on Science and Technology for Development (administered by UNCTAD)

15 May – 2 June        42nd Session of the Committee on the Rights of the Child

15 May – 30 June     United Nations Conference on Disarmament

17 May                       World Information Society Day, theme ‘Promoting Global Cybersecurity’ AND World Telecommunications Day

18-19 May                  Conference on International Audiovisual Law:  Film Distribution, New Technology and Piracy (Cannes, in association with the International Film Festival)

19 May                       Second round of consultations in preparation for the Internet Governance Forum in Athens from 30 October to 2 November 2006

22 May                       International Day for Biological Diversity, theme ‘Protect Biodiversity in Drylands: Achieving the 2010 Biodiversity Target!’

22-23 May                  First meeting of the Internet Governance Forum Advisory Group

22-27 May                  WHO 59th Session of the World Health Assembly

29-31 May                  WHO X Session of the Executive Board

31 May                       World No-Tobacco Day, theme ‘Tobacco: Deadly in Any Form or Disguise’

31 May-2 June           High-Level Meeting on AIDS, UN General Assembly (New York)

31 May – 16 June     ILO 95th Session of the International Labor Conference

5 June                         World Environment Day, theme ‘Deserts and Desertification: Don’t Desert the Drylands!

12 and 16 June         ILO 296th Session of the Governing Body

12-23 June                 UNDP and UNFPA Executive Board Meeting

16 June                      United Nations Energy Security Forum

19 June                      First session of the Human Rights Council begins

23 June                      United Nations Executive Committee

27-29 June                 60th Session of the Security Council Governing Council

Back to the top